WILLIAMS

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …mstances surrounding the prosecutorial decision at issue’ suggests the ‘appearance of vindictiveness.’ ” United States v. Robison, 644 F. 2d 1270, 1272 (9th Cir. 1981), quoting United States v. Griffin, 617 F. 2d 1342, 1347 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 863, 101 S.Ct. 167, 66 L.Ed.2d 80 (1980). The prosecution has the burden of rebutting the appearance of vindictiveness by demonstrating either independent reasons or intervening circumstances. Robison, 644 F. 2d at 1272. . For a thorough discussion of…
• United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co., Inc., 458 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1982)
  …l decision under 28 U. S. C. § 1291.” 646 F. 2d 384, 386 (1981).1 In reaching this holding the Court of Appeals relied on its prior decisions in United States v. Burt, 619 F. 2d 831 (1980), and United States v. Griffin, 617 F. 2d 1342, cert. denied, 449 U. S. 863 (1980). Reaching the merits, the court held that respondents had established a case of prosecutorial vindictiveness requiring dismissal of the superseding indictment. The United States then sought review in this Court. We do not reach the question…
• Adamson v. Ricketts, 865 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …circumstances surrounding the prosecutorial decision at issue create the appearance of vindictiveness.5 United States v. Robison, 644 F. 2d 1270, 1272 (9th Cir.1981); see also United States v. Griffin, 617 F. 2d 1342, 1347 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 863, 101 S.Ct. 167, 66 L.Ed.2d 80 (1980) (mere appearance of vindictiveness may give rise to presumption sufficient to establish due process violation); United States v. Groves, 571 F. 2d 450, 453 (9th Cir.1978) (“it is the appearance of vindictiveness…