HUNTER

v.

WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1985)
  …dged that the decision below was consistent with dictum in two recent Ninth Circuit decisions. See United States v. Wiga, 662 F. 2d 1325, 1329 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U. S. 918 (1982); United States v. Williams, 630 F. 2d 1322, 1326, cert. denied, 449 U. S. 865 (1980). Only one case contained any reference to heightened expectations of privacy in mobile living quarters. United States v. Cadena, 588 F. 2d 100, 101-102 (CA5 1979) (per curiam). Analogizing to automobile cases, the court upheld the warrantles…
• United States v. Whitten, 706 F.2d 1000 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …risk of explosion presented an exigent circumstance that would have justified an immediate warrantless search. His findings are supported by the record and by the law. See United States v. Williams, 630 F. 2d 1322, 1326-27 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 865, 101 S.Ct. 197, 66 L.Ed.2d 83 (1980) (risk of explosion from PCP lab in mobile home). The Telephone Warrant The Fourth Amendment expressly provides that no warrants may issue except those “particularly describing the place to be searched, and the…
• United States v. Hillison, 733 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …ing the significance of the association is whether the known criminal activity was contemporaneous with the association. 1 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 3.6, at 659-61; see United States v. Williams, 630 F. 2d 1322, 1325 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 865, 101 S.Ct. 197, 66 L.Ed.2d 83 (1980). Another is whether the nature of the criminal activity is such that it could not normally be carried on without the knowledge of all persons present. 1 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 3.6, at 658-61; see William…