BOWEN

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Niziolek v. Ashe, 694 F.2d 282 (1st Cir. 1982)
  …United States. Principles of comity dictate that a higher standard of cognizability be required of errors alleged by prisoners who are incarcerated as a result of state court proceedings. Fasano v. Hall, 615 F. 2d 555, 557 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867, 101 S.Ct. 201, 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980). Of course, state trial errors that render a fair trial impossible will be cognizable in federal habeas corpus, because such errors violate the due process clause. Many trial errors, however, are not of suffici…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Barrett v. United States, 965 F.2d 1184 (1st Cir. 1992)
  …nts] ‘a fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice.’ ” Fasano v. Hall, 615 F. 2d 555, 557 (1st Cir.) (quoting Davis v. United States, 417 U.S. 333, 345, 94 S.Ct. 2298, 2302, 41 L.Ed.2d 109 (1974)), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867, 101 S.Ct. 201, 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); see United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178, 99 S.Ct. 2235, 60 L.Ed.2d 805 (1979) (discussing rationale for restrictions on collateral attacks against criminal convictions); United States v. Capua, 656 F. 2d 10…