SMITH

v.

WASHINGTON

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• State v. Leveque, 530 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …86); United States v. Whit-ten, 706 F. 2d 1000 (9th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1100, 104 S.Ct. 1593, 80 L.Ed.2d 125 (1984); United States v. Gil-man, 684 F. 2d 616 (9th Cir.1982); United States v. Gill, 623 F. 2d 540 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 873, 101 S.Ct. 214, 66 L.Ed.2d 94 (1980); United States v. Page, 580 F. 2d 916 (7th Cir.1978). The trial court was concerned that no additional investigation was conducted, such as with the landlord or utility companies, to determine whether the door l…
• Burson v. Freeman, 504 U.S. 191 (U.S. 1992)
  …ocial Science 738 (1892). See, e. g., Season-All Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 664 F. 2d 932 (CA3 1981); NLRB v. Carroll Contracting and Ready-Mix, Inc., 636 F. 2d 111 (CA5 1981); Midwest Stock Exchange, Inc. v. NLRB, 620 F. 2d 629 (CA7), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 873 (1980); Michem, Inc., 170 N. L. R. B. 362 (1968); Claussen Baking Co., 134 N. L. R. B. 111 (1961). The logical connection between ballot secrecy and restricted zones distinguishes this case from those cited by the dissent in which the Court struck…
• Adamson v. Ricketts, 865 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …fe,” State v. Clark, 126 Ariz. 428, 437, 616 P. 2d 888, 897, cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1067, 101 S.Ct. 796, 66 L.Ed.2d 612 (1980), or where the defendant’s conduct is “perverted.” State v. Madsen, 125 Ariz. 346, 352, 609 P. 2d 1046, 1052, cert. denied, 449 U.S. 873, 101 S.Ct. 213, 66 L.Ed.2d 93 (1980). These words give precious little guidance as to the meaning of (F)(6)’s key terms. 2. In 1983, the Arizona Supreme Court in State v. Gretzler reviewed nearly all of its “especially cruel, heinous and depraved”…