CHOCALLO, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Se. Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. Dep't OF Natural Res., 453 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 1984)
  …r-breadth and vagueness are separate and distinct. The overbreadth doctrine applies only if the legislation “is susceptible of application to conduct protected by the First Amendment.” Carricarte v. State, 384 So. 2d 1261, 1262 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980) (citing Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 90 S.Ct. 1153, 25 L.Ed.2d 491 (1970)). See also McKenney v. State, 388 So. 2d 1232 (Fla.1980); State v. Ashcraft, 378 So. 2d 284 (Fla.1979). See generally Note, Th…
• State v. Salvadore Saiez, 489 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 1986)
  …o Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 611-13, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2915-17, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 486-87, 85 S.Ct. 1116, 1120-21, 14 L.Ed.2d 22 (1965); Carricarte v. State, 384 So. 2d 1261, 1262 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980). This doctrine operates as an exception to the traditional rule of standing [*1127] which does not permit a person to whom a statute may constitutionally be applied to challenge that statute on the ground that it…
• Agudo, Pineiro & Kates, P.A. v. Harbert Constr. Co., 476 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …s. 775.083. We note first that there are questions concerning the applicability of the statute in this case. The difficulty arises because the statute has been construed only occasionally. Carricarte v. State, 384 So. 2d 1261 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 874, 101 S.Ct. 215, 66 L.Ed.2d 95 (1980); Pace v. State, 368 So. 2d 340 (Fla.1979); State ex rel. Farber v. Williams, 183 So. 2d 537 (Fla.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 845, 87 S.Ct. 42, 17 L.Ed.2d 76 (1966); Thomas v. Ratiner, 462 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1…