SANDOVAL

v.

ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Severo D. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …it is not ordinarily subject to appellate review. United States v. Dickey, 736 F. 2d 571, 597-98 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 105 S.Ct. 957, 83 L.Ed.2d 964 (1985); United States v. Prazak, 623 F. 2d 152, 155 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880, 101 S.Ct. 229, 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980). We will review the sentences only if the trial judge based them on “misinformation of constitutional magnitude” or failed to exercise any discretion in the sentencing process. United States v. LeMon, 622 F. 2d…
• United States v. Hack, 782 F.2d 862 (10th Cir. 1986)
  …failed to exercise any discretion in imposing an appropriate penalty. Yates v. United States, 356 U.S. 363, 366-67, 78 S.Ct. 766, 768-69, 2 L.Ed.2d 837, 840 (1958) (per curiam); United States v. Prazak, 623 F. 2d 152, 155 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880, 101 S.Ct. 229, 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980); United States v. Thompson, 680 F. 2d 1145, 1149 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1089, 103 S.Ct. 573, 74 L.Ed.2d 934 (1982). Section 371, 18 U.S.C. authorizes, and Hack does not contend otherwise, for a fine…
• United States v. Weaver, 882 F.2d 1128 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …er. For example, in State v. Bronkema, 109 Idaho 211, 214, 706 P. 2d 100, 103 (Ct.App.1985), the court held that only written notification would suffice to constitute a detainer. In United States v. Reed, 620 F. 2d 709, 711 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880, 101 S.Ct. 229, 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980), state officials learned that the prisoner was wanted to face federal charges and marked his records with the notation “Hold for U.S. Marshals.” The court held that this did not constitute a detainer since the n…