CARTERA

v.

VIRGINIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Weaver, 882 F.2d 1128 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …er. For example, in State v. Bronkema, 109 Idaho 211, 214, 706 P. 2d 100, 103 (Ct.App.1985), the court held that only written notification would suffice to constitute a detainer. In United States v. Reed, 620 F. 2d 709, 711 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880, 101 S.Ct. 229, 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980), state officials learned that the prisoner was wanted to face federal charges and marked his records with the notation “Hold for U.S. Marshals.” The court held that this did not constitute a detainer since the n…
• United States v. Donaldson, 978 F.2d 381 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …informations or complaints.’ ” United States v. Mauro, 436 U.S. 340, 343, 98 S.Ct. 1834, 1839, 56 L.Ed.2d 329 (1977) (quoting Article I of the Act, 18 U.S.C.App., pp. 585-592 (1985 ed.); United States v. Reed, 620 F. 2d 709 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880, 101 S.Ct. 229, 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980)). The Act allows prisoners to demand the speedy disposition of charges pending against them in other jurisdictions, and serves “to prevent prosecutorial abuses of the detainer that potentially allow a prisoner…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Coleman v. O'Leary, 845 F.2d 696 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …or unevenly applied state procedural rules would ‘force resort to an arid ritual of meaningless form.’ ” Id. (citations omitted) (emphasis added). See also United States ex rel. Burnett v. Illinois, 619 F. 2d 668, 670-73 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880, 101 S.Ct. 229, 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980) (Arbitrary application of Illinois waiver rule would justify federal habeas relief). While “state law must furnish an independent and adequate ground for the [state] court’s ruling,” Williams, 826 F. 2d at 659…