MICHIGAN

v.

HAMPTON

Citator

Cited By (49 total)

• Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (U.S. 1984)
  …c) an opportunity for a hearing.” Stenson v. Blum, 476 F. Supp. 1331, 1335 (1979). The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed in an unpublished oral opinion from the bench. Affirmance order, Stenson v. Blum, 628 F. 2d 1345, cert. denied, 449 U. S. 885 (1980). Respondent’s subsequent request for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees under § 1988 is the subject of the present case. B Throughout this litigation, respondent was represented by attorneys from the Legal Aid Society of New York, a p…
• Jones v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., 722 F.2d 159 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …r.1981) (citations omitted). See Haley v. Estelle, 632 F. 2d 1273 (5th Cir.1980). But, in this circuit, the “ ‘abuse of the Writ’ doctrine is of rare and extraordinary application.” Paprskar v. Estelle, 612 F. 2d 1003, 1007 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 885, 101 S.Ct. 239, 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1980) (citation omitted). See Hardwick v. Doolittle, 558 F. 2d 292 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1049, 98 S.Ct. 897, 54 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978); Simpson v. Wainwright, 488 F. 2d 494 (5th Cir.1973). The doctrine is…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Brown v. Louie L. Wainwright, 665 F.2d 607 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …t has held that a right of self-representation was recognized in this Circuit prior to Faretta, and therefore the issue of Faretta’s retroactive application need not be considered. See Scott v. Wainwright, 617 F. 2d 99 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 885, 101 S.Ct. 240, 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1980); Chapman v. United States, 553 F. 2d 886 (5th Cir. 1977). The right of self-representation entails a waiver of the right to counsel, since a defendant obviously cannot enjoy both rights at trial. Because of the…