WHIG PARTY OF ALABAMA ET AL.

v.

SIEGELMAN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ALABAMA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 450 U.S. 455 (U.S. 1981)
  …versy over the constitutionality of Art. 2404. However, because these legislative changes were effective only as of January 1, 1980, they do not govern the mortgage executed by Mr. Feenstra in 1974. The suggestion of mootness was therefore rejected. 449 U. S. 916 (1980). Nor will this. Court speculate about the existence of such a justification. “The burden ... is on those defending the discrimination to make out the claimed justification . . . Wengler v. Druggist Mutual Ins. Co., 446 U. S. 142, 151 (1980).…
• Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 708 F.2d 991 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …lity of Article 2404. However, because this revision was effective only as of January 1, 1980, the Supreme Court concluded that the revised statutes did not govern the 1974 mortgage, and rejected the state defendants’ motion. Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 449 U.S. 916, 101 S.Ct. 313, 66 L.Ed.2d 144 (1980).2 Because a finding of mootness would have required that this Court’s opinion be vacated, Mrs. Feenstra’s counsel were forced to oppose the state defendants’ motion in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court unani…