KRAMARCZYK

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• East BAY Chevrolet dba Time Chevrolet v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 659 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …wever, the request for costs and attorney fees was only ancillary to the major questions presented. Omission of a discussion of ancillary issues does not warrant remand. J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 612 F. 2d 881, 883 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 918, 101 S.Ct. 315, 66 L.Ed.2d 145 (1980). III. CONCLUSION The Employer’s petition for review is GRANTED. The Board’s petition for enforcement of the remedial order is DENIED. The case is remanded to the Board for reconsideration of a remedial order i…
• Lyonel DOR v. Dist. Dir., 891 F.2d 997 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …on unqual- [*1004] ifiedly correct is faced with a problem: what happens now? Obviously, this Court has full authority to vacate a stay of its own mandate. See Miller v. Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc., 545 F. 2d 1019, 1020 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 918, 101 S.Ct. 315, 66 L.Ed.2d 145 (1980). In its June 12, 1989 decision, the AAU held that “the sole issue in the proceeding is whether [Dor] is statutorily ineligible for [adjustment of status under subparagraph (a)(3) of § 202 of IRCA].” (event 24)…