WARGO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Montes-Cardenas, 746 F.2d 771 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.6 Second, we must determine whether the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to order a severance under Rule 14.7 United States v. Forrest, 623 F. 2d 1107, 1114 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 924, 101 S.Ct. 327, 66 L.Ed.2d 153 (1980).8 Improper joinder under Rule 8 presents a question of law subject to plenary review by this court. United States v. Park, 531 F. 2d 754, 760 (5th Cir.1976). In addressing this issue, however, we must construe…
• United States v. Harrelson, 754 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …minal liability for his conduct charged in the tax return counts. As a result, a direct relationship exists between the tax return counts and the witness intimidation count.”); United States v. Forrest, 623 F. 2d 1107, 1114 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 924, 101 S.Ct. 327, 66 L.Ed.2d 153 (1980) (perjury charges properly joined with jury tampering charges because both derived from defendant’s trial for same substantive offense); United States v. Quinones, 516 F. 2d 1309, 1312 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 4…
• United States v. Fagan, 821 F.2d 1002 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …uting parts of a common scheme or plan.” We review de novo the district court’s denial of a Rule 8(a) motion. United States v. Davis, 752 F. 2d 963, 971 (5th Cir.1985); [*1007] United States v. Forrest, 623 F. 2d 1107, 1114 (5th Cir.); cert. denied, 449 U.S. 924, 101 S.Ct. 327, 66 L.Ed.2d 153 (1980); cf. United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438, 106 S.Ct. 725, 732 n. 12, 88 L.Ed.2d 814 (1986) (joinder of defendants under Rule 8(6) is reviewed on appeal for an “error of law”). In rejecting Fagan’s motion to seve…