ST. MARTIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH ET AL.

v.

SOUTH DAKOTA

Citator

Cited By

• Univ. OF Tex. v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390 (U.S. 1981)
  …d been graduated. The Court of Appeals, however, rejected a suggestion that the case was therefore moot. The court said: “[A] justiciable issue remains: whose responsibility is it to pay for this interpreter?” Id., at 130-131. We granted certiorari, 449 U. S. 950, and Camenisch has now raised the mootness issue before this Court. The Court of Appeals correctly held that the case as a whole is not moot, since, as that court noted, it remains to be decided who should ultimately bear the cost of the interprete…
• Cnty. of Wash. v. Gunther, 452 U.S. 161 (U.S. 1981)
  …The court remanded to the District Court with instructions to take evidence on respondents’ claim that part of the difference between their rate of pay and that of the male guards is attributable to sex [*166] discrimination. We granted certiorari, 449 U. S. 950 (1980), and now affirm. We emphasize at the outset the narrowness of the question before us in this case. Respondents’ claim is not based on the controversial concept of “comparable worth,” 6 under which plaintiffs might claim increased compensatio…
• Clayton v. Int'l Union, 451 U.S. 679 (U.S. 1981)
  …n a fair hearing.7 Others would also excuse the employee’s failure to exhaust if the substantive relief available through the internal procedures would be less than that available in his § 301 action.8 We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 449 U. S. 950 (1980). We reverse the dismissal of Clayton’s suit against the union and affirm the reversal of the dismissal of his suit against the employer. We hold that where an internal union appeals procedure cannot result in reactivation of the employee’s gr…