OKC CORP.

v.

WILLIAMS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Fahey, 769 F.2d 829 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …ict must be real, not some attenuated hypothesis having little consequence to the adequacy of representation. Brien v. United States, 695 F. 2d 10, 15 (1st Cir.1982); United States v. Martorano, 620 F. 2d 912, 916 (1st Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952, 101 S.Ct. 356, 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980). If the defendant demonstrates that an actual conflict of interest affected the adequacy of representation he need not demonstrate prejudice. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, [*836] 104 S.Ct. 2068; Flanag…
• United States v. Walker Bennett Monroe, 943 F.2d 1007 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …t § 1956(a)(2) applied to wire transfers. Contrary to Monroe’s contention, there was no ex post facto violation. See United States v. Tapert, 625 F. 2d 111, 120-21 (6th Cir.) (applying subsequent amendment to affirm felony conviction), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952, 101 S.Ct. 356, 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980)). B Monroe argues that even if a wire transfer constitutes a violation of § 1956(a)(2), there was insufficient evidence to establish that he and his coconspirators attempted to do so. The indictment charged t…
• Williamson v. United States Dep't OF Agric., 815 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965). Williams v. Collins, 728 F. 2d 721, 727 (5th Cir.1984). See also Lage v. Thomas, 585 F.Supp. 403 (N.D.Tex.1984); OKC Corp. v. Williams, 489 F.Supp. 576 (N.D.Tex.), aff'd 614 F. 2d 58, reh’g denied 617 F. 2d 1207, cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952,101 S.Ct. 357, 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980). Furthermore, allegations of malice on the part of the federal official are irrelevant for purposes of determining the availability of absolute immunity. Barr v. Mateo, supra, 360 U.S. at 575, 79 S.Ct. at 1341; W…