SALINAS

v.

UNITED STATES; AND MALDONADO V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Bundy v. State, 455 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1984)
  …rial court’s discretion to deny a defendant’s request for particular counsel when there is a “countervailing public interest in the fair and orderly administration of justice.” United States v. Salinas, 618 F. 2d 1092, 1093 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961, 101 S.Ct. 374, 66 L.Ed.2d 228 (1980). The state argues that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion because of the out-of-state attorney’s prior misconduct which disrupted the orderly administration of justice. See Unite…
• United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …resurfaced recently. In Brennan’s Inc. v. Brennan’s Restaurants, Inc., 590 F. 2d 168 (5th Cir. 1979), the court adopted the Woods standard. Id. at 171. Just one year later, in United States v. Salinas, 618 F. 2d 1092, 1093 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961, 101 S.Ct. 374, 66 L.Ed.2d 228 (1980), the court followed Gopman and applied the “abuse of discretion” standard. Only several months ago, however, the court decided Cossette v. Country Style Donuts, Inc., 647 F. 2d 526, 530 (5th Cir. 1981), in which…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Zepp, 748 F.2d 125 (3d Cir. 1984)
  …een a finding made by the district court that the attorney involved should be disqualified because he was either the target of a grand jury investigation or was under indictment. See United States v. Salinas, 618 F. 2d 1092 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961, 101 S.Ct. 374, 66 L.Ed.2d 228 (1980); In re Investigation Before February, 1977, Lynchburg Grand Jury, 563 F. 2d 652 (4th Cir.1977) (attorneys disqualified because targets of investigation concerning activities in which clients were involved); Unit…

  ← 1 / 2 →