JACKSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1986)
  …ed to submit timely proof-of-loss forms here, the insurer might very well have discovered the fraud. The Lanes contend that the Fifth Circuit’s decision in this action also conflicts with United States v. Ledesma, 632 F. 2d 670 (CA7), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 998 (1980), which reversed a conviction involving the mailing of a fraudulent proof-of-loss form after receipt of insurance proceeds. In that case, however, the Seventh Circuit never discussed Sampson or the possibility that the delayed mailing had any…
• Williams v. Maggio, 679 F.2d 381 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …ng circumstances are not supported. State v. Monroe, 397 So. 2d 1258 (La.1981); State v. Williams, 383 So. 2d 369 (La.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1103, 101 S.Ct. 899 [66 L.Ed.2d 828]; [*405] State v. Martin, 376 So. 2d 300 (La.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998, 101 S.Ct. 540 [66 L.Ed.2d 297]. The jury properly found that at least one statutory aggravating circumstance existed, that is, defendant was engaged in the perpetration of armed robbery when the victim was murdered; therefore, we consider it unnec…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 825 F.2d 572 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …spondence. His testimony concerning the ordinary business practices of his office was sufficient to allow the jury to infer that the letter was delivered through the mail. See United States v. Ledesma, 632 F. 2d 670, 675-76 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998, 101 S.Ct. 539, 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980); see also United States v. Davidson, 760 F. 2d 97, 98-99 (6th Cir.1985). . Section 1341 provides in applicable part: Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, ... for th…