NEW YORK

v.

HOWARD

Citator

Cited By

• Hill v. The City OF Houston, 764 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …L.Ed.2d 408 (1972). See also Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville, 422 U.S. 205, 216-17, 95 S.Ct. 2268, 2276, 45 L.Ed.2d 125 (1975). Accord Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Probation, 632 F. 2d 938, 942 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023, 101 S.Ct. 591, [*1165] 66 L.Ed.2d 485 (1980); Walker v. Dillard, 523 F. 2d 3, 6 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 906, 96 S.Ct. 208, 46 L.Ed.2d 136 (1975). See generally M. Nimmer, supra at § 4.11[D]. . 764 F. 2d at 1170 (Higginbotham, J., dissen…
• Shackelford v. Shirley, 948 F.2d 935 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …constitutional attack, noted that the statute’s “narrow intent requirement precludes the proscription of mere communication.” Id. at 787; see also Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Dep’t of Probation, 632 F. 2d 938, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023, 101 S.Ct. 591, 66 L.Ed.2d 485 (1980) (rejecting first amendment challenge to Connecticut telephone harassment statute in habeas corpus appeal); State v. Thompson, 701 P. 2d 694, 697-98 (Kan.1985) (intent requirement narrows reach of telephone haras…