ROBINSON

v.

MCCALL ET AL.; ROBINSON V. WOODARD ET AL.; ROBINSON V. NORTH CAROLINA ET AL.; ROBINSON V. SALMON ET AL.; AND ROBINSON V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Citator

Cited By

• California v. Ramos, 463 U.S. 992 (U.S. 1983)
  …. 2d 302 (Okla. Crim. App. 1978) (noncapital); State v. Leland, 190 Ore. 598, 227 P. 2d 785 (1951), aff’d, 343 U. S. 790 (1952); Commonwealth v. Aljoe, 420 Pa. 198, 216 A. 2d 50 (1966); State v. Goolsby, 275 S. C. 110, 268 S. E. 2d 31, cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1037 (1980); Farris v. [*1027] State, 535 S. W. 2d 608 (Tenn. 1976) (noncapital); Clanton v. State, 528 S. W. 2d 250 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975); Clanton v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 41, 286 S. E. 2d 172 (1982); State v. Todd, 78 Wash. 2d 362, 474 P. 2d 542 (1970…
• Dutton v. John N. Brown & the Attorney Gen. of the State of Okla., 812 F.2d 593 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …marily through the testimony of petitioner’s mother. We cannot fault counsel for failing to anticipate the unexpected, i.e., the trial court’s sua sponte exclusion of Mrs. Dutton. United States v. Vader, 630 F. 2d 792, 794 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1037, 101 S.Ct. 616, 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980). Although more could have been done to investigate sources of mitigating evidence, we agree with the conclusion reached by the many judges that have already reviewed this issue that trial counsel’s preparation a…
• United States v. Beckman, 662 F.2d 661 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …counsel was not on his feet objecting to every question put by the prosecutor doesn’t prove counsel’s incompetence. In rejecting a similar claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in United States v. Vader, 630 F. 2d 792 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1037, 101 S.Ct. 616, 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980), we made the following comment which has present applicability: Counsel in this Court, who did not represent Vader in the trial of the case, also seeks reversal on the ground that trial counsel was incompetent…