MONTGOMERY
v.
UNITED STATES
MONTGOMERY
UNITED STATES
449 U.S. 1038
Supreme Court of the United States (1980)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 73 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (71 total)
-
Armstrong v. State, 566 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…instances where other courts have considered the general issue. United States v. Espinal, 757 F. 2d 423, 426 (1st Cir.1985); United States v. Gray, 626 F. 2d 494, 501 n. 2 and accompanying text (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, sub nom, Wright v. U.S., 449 U.S. 1038, 101 S.Ct. 616, 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980); State v. Dozier, 163 W.Va. 192, 255 S.E. 2d 552 (W.Va.1979). See also McPhee v. State, 254 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).…
-
Brown v. State, 484 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…e for the disposition of stolen goods and, in so doing, were able to identify the perpetrators of previously committed crimes. The providing of essential services is not misconduct. United States v. Gray, 626 F. 2d 494, 498 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038, 101 S.Ct. 616, 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1091, 101 S.Ct. 887, 66 L.Ed.2d 820, cert. denied, 450 U.S. 919, 101 S.Ct. 1367, 67 L.Ed.2d 346 (1981). The fencing service provided by B & T was not unique, and “customers” were more tha…
-
Sarno v. State, 424 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…, 100 S.Ct. 2439, 65 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980). As to the remainder of the police activities, we cannot say that they were so shocking as to invoke the extraordinary remedy the appellants seek. United States v. Gray, 626 F. 2d 494 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038, 101 S.Ct. 616, 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980), 449 U.S. 1091, 101 S.Ct. 887, 66 L.Ed.2d 820 (1981); United States v. Thomas, 567 F. 2d 638 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 822, 99 S.Ct. 90, 58 L.Ed.2d 114 (1978); United States v. Leja, 563 F. 2d 244 (6th…
Previewing 3 of 71 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence