CIANCIULLI ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• Klamath-Lake Pharm. Ass'n v. Klamath Med. Serv. Bureau, 701 F.2d 1276 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …court. Maykuth v. Adolph Coors Co., 690 F. 2d 689, 693 (9th Cir.1982); Martin v. United States, 649 F. 2d 701, 703 (9th Cir.1981); Kittitas Reclamation District v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District, 626 F. 2d 95, 98 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1079, 101 S.Ct. 861, 66 L.Ed.2d 802 (1981). Because there are no disputed factual circumstances, this issue is also ripe for summary disposition. [*1283] We again find that the district court erred. Our task is to enforce the intent of the parties. Sun…
• McELROY v. United States, 455 U.S. 642 (U.S. 1982)
  …80) (construing similar language in 18 U. S. C. § 659, the court held that “[djelays enroute do not deprive shipments of continued characterization as interstate or foreign so long as the goods have not yet reached their destination”), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1079 (1981); United States v. Maddox, 394 F. 2d 297, 299-300 (CA4 1968) (18 U. S. C. § 659); United States v. Hiscott, 586 F. 2d 1271, 1274 (CA8 1978) (18 U. S. C. § 2313); United States v. Goble, 512 F. 2d 458, 469 (CA6 1975) (18 U. S. C. § 2313). We r…
• United States v. Singer, 660 F.2d 1295 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …it is clear that the beef was moving in interstate commerce. See United States v. Thies, 569 F. 2d 1268, 1272-73 (3d Cir. 1978) (18 U.S.C. § 2315); cf. United States v. Garber, 626 F. 2d 1144, 1147-52 (3d Cir. 1980) (18 U.S.C. § 659), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1079, 101 S.Ct. 860, 66 L.Ed.2d 802 (1981);22 United States v. Franklin, supra, 568 F. 2d at 1157 (18 U.S.C. § 659). Wagner next argues that the government’s evidence failed to show that the defendants removed the beef from the trailer. Wagner argues th…

  ← 1 / 2 →