MURRELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Pollock, 726 F.2d 1456 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …on of his case. Third, the general rule is that a criminal defendant must object to defects in the indictment prior to trial, not prior to indictment. Fed. R.Crim.P. 12; see United States v. Tercero, 640 F. 2d 190, 195 (9th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1084, 101 S.Ct. 871, 66 L.Ed.2d 809 (1981). We find, therefore, that a defendant’s right to object to not being indicted in a timely fashion is not waived upon indictment though the objection must be raised prior to trial. But see H.R.Rep. No. 390, 96th…
• United States v. Long, 706 F.2d 1044 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …aised in the district court. This court need not review issues not raised in the court below. Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 556, 61 S.Ct. 719, 721, 85 L.Ed. 1037 (1941). See also U.S. v. Tercero, 640 F. 2d 190, 195 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1084, 101 S.Ct. 871, 66 L.Ed.2d 809 (1981). In any event, the issues Long now seeks to raise on appeal, that as a target witness he should have been given Miranda warnings; and that he should have been warned of possible perjury charges, are without mer…
• United States v. Clifford Howard (83-5434, 752 F.2d 220 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …v. Pennell, supra, at 532-533 (adopting abuse of discretion standard of review of trial court’s decision not to grant a mistrial for alleged unauthorized contact with jurors); United States v. Sisk, 629 F. 2d 1174, 1179 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1084, 101 S.Ct. 871, 66 L.Éd.2d 809 (1981) (“Ordinarily a trial judge’s estimate of jury prejudice is accorded ‘the highest degree of respect.’ ”). The district court found Black’s testimony credible and that she sat as an impartial juror. Findings of F…