WILEY

v.

KANSAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Nelson, 718 F.2d 315 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …nited States v. Dinitz, 424 U.S. 600, 607 (1976); United States v. Roberts, 640 F. 2d 225, 228 (9thcir.l981), cert, denied, 452 U.S. 942, 101 S.Ct. 3088, 69 L.Ed.2d 957 (1981); United States v. Smith, 621 F. 2d 350, 351 (9th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1087, 101 S.Ct. 877, 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981). “Such a motion by the defendant is deemed to be a deliberate election on his part to forego his valued right to have his guilt or innocence determined before the first trier of fact.” United States v. Scott, 43…
• Lovinger v. Cir. Court OF THE 19TH Jud. Cir., 845 F.2d 739 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …ly there was no opportunity to object); Russo, 483 F. 2d at 17. Cf. United States v. Buljubasic, 808 F. 2d 1260, 1266 (7th Cir.1987) (defendant had “ample time to deliberate”); United States v. Smith, 621 F. 2d 350, 352 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087, 101 S.Ct. 877, 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981) (“Defense counsel did not object to the order of mistrial, despite adequate opportunity to do so.”); United States v. Goldstein, 479 F. 2d 1061, 1066-67 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873, 94 S.Ct. 151, 38 L.…
• Adamson v. Ricketts, 789 F.2d 722 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …ial following an unnecessary mistrial, declared without the defendant’s request or express consent, if the defendant’s statements or silences constitute an implied consent. See United States v. Smith, 621 F. 2d 350, 351 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087, 101 S.Ct. 877, 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981). The mistrial exceptions to the double jeopardy bar clearly refute the notion that the bar is absolute. The Supreme Court in United States v. Dinitz, 424 U.S. 600, 609 n. 11, 96 S.Ct. 1075, 1080-81 n. 11, 47 L.…