FERRELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1983)
  …isciplinary, or administrative reasons,” 462 F. Supp., at 403, was sufficient to create a protected expectation that an inmate would not be segregated for arbitrary reasons. See also Bills v. Henderson, 631 F. 2d 1287, 1293 (CA6 1980), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1093 (1981); Winsett v. McGinnes, 617 F. 2d 996, 107 (CA3 1980) (en banc). Rule IV, ¶3(d)(8), provides: “The facility administrator will, within a reasonable period of time, review the Program Committee’s recommendation. He may, as the final decisionma…
• Bd. OF Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 (U.S. 1987)
  …Justice White has pointed out, the Circuits have split on the question whether the absence of mandatory language creating a presumption of release precludes a finding that a statute or regulation creates a liberty interest. See Anderson v. Winsett, 449 U. S. 1093 (1981) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). But, as the following analysis of the decisions of the Courts of Appeals demonstrates, even under the most “restrictive interpretation of Greenholtz,” Baumann v. Arizona Department of Corre…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Mastelotto, 717 F.2d 1238 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …ariance could be avoided. See Kenny, 645 F. 2d at 1336 (no variance, where evidence sufficient and proper instructions given); United States v. Lutz, 621 F. 2d 940, 943 (9th Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859, 101 S.Ct. 160, 66 L.Ed.2d 75, 449 U.S. 1093, 101 S.Ct. 890, 66 L.Ed.2d 822 (1981). B We now consider the adequacy of the jury instructions.8 In a mail or wire fraud case in which a defendant contends that a variance has occurred between the single scheme charged in each count of the indictm…

  ← 1 / 2 →