FAIR
v.
GEORGIA; DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF LOUISIANA V. BEAIRD-POULAN, INC.; COLBY V. HARRIS, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; EMPRESAS ELECTRONICAS WALSER, INC., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; SUTTON V. JOINT BAR ASSOCIATION GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE SECOND AND ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS; STONE ET AL. V. GRAHAM, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF KENTUCKY; KORN V. OHIO; SILVERMAN V. UNITED STATES; QUINAULT PACIFIC CORP. ET AL. V. AETNA BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., ET AL.; QUINAULT PACIFIC CORP. ET AL. V. AETNA BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., ET AL.; GRAYDON V. PASADENA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ET AL. (HAHN, INC., REAL PARTY IN INTEREST); CENTRAL LIQUOR CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; O'CONNOR ET UX. V. PALLUDAN CORP.; BAUN V. CIVILETTI, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.; SANDERS ET AL. V. HANKINS; BECKER V. EVANS; BLAKNEY V. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA; BLAKNEY V. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA; WOODARD V. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL.
FAIR
GEORGIA; DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF LOUISIANA V. BEAIRD-POULAN, INC.; COLBY V. HARRIS, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; EMPRESAS ELECTRONICAS WALSER, INC., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; SUTTON V. JOINT BAR ASSOCIATION GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE SECOND AND ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS; STONE ET AL. V. GRAHAM, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF KENTUCKY; KORN V. OHIO; SILVERMAN V. UNITED STATES; QUINAULT PACIFIC CORP. ET AL. V. AETNA BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., ET AL.; QUINAULT PACIFIC CORP. ET AL. V. AETNA BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., ET AL.; GRAYDON V. PASADENA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ET AL. (HAHN, INC., REAL PARTY IN INTEREST); CENTRAL LIQUOR CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; O'CONNOR ET UX. V. PALLUDAN CORP.; BAUN V. CIVILETTI, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.; SANDERS ET AL. V. HANKINS; BECKER V. EVANS; BLAKNEY V. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA; BLAKNEY V. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA; WOODARD V. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL.
449 U.S. 1104
Supreme Court of the United States (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burger v. Kemp, 753 F.2d 930 (11th Cir. 1985)…tt v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 [98 S.Ct. 2954, 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978) ] [cits]; Collier v. State, [244 Ga. 553, 261 S.E. 2d 364 (1979) ]." Fair v. State, 245 Ga. 868, 268 S.E. 2d 316, cert. denied, 449 U.S. 986, 101 S.Ct. 407, 66 L.Ed.2d 250, reh’g denied, 449 U.S. 1104, 101 S.Ct. 903, 66 L.Ed.2d 831 (1980); O.C.G.A. § 17-10-2. This may include ”[a]ny lawful evidence which tends to show the motive of the defendant, his lack of remorse, his general moral character, and his predisposition to commit other crimes ... s…
-
Roberts v. Madigan, 921 F.2d 1047 (10th Cir. 1990)…blishment Clause in the context of the public schools, it is important to note that the condemned activity was openly pursued or actively — rather than passively — sponsored: Stone v. Grahamn, 449 U.S. 39, 101 S.Ct. 192, 66 L.Ed.2d 199, reh. denied, 449 U.S. 1104, 101 S.Ct. 904, 66 L.Ed.2d 832 (1980) (held that the posting of a copy of the Ten Commandments on the wall of each public school room violated the Establishment Clause because no secular purpose had been demonstrated); Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421,…