SCHAFFER

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (90 total)

• State v. Torres, 498 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …olice to await the arrival of customs officers are valid. United States v. Lavado, 750 F. 2d 1527 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 789, 88 L.Ed.2d 768 (1986); see United States v. Moore, 638 F. 2d 1171 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1113, 101 S.Ct. 924, 66 L.Ed.2d 842 (1981); see also United States v. Mosquera-Ramirez, 729 F. 2d 1352 (11th Cir.1984) (twelve hour detention of internal drug smuggler until nature revealed what an x-ray would have shown not unreasonable); United States…
• United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …poured down their gullets.4 Moreover, it is no longer open to question that the ABSCAM operation was deliberately leaked to the press. See United States v. Criden, 633 F. 2d 346, 348 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied sub nom. Schaffer v. United States, 449 U.S. 1113, 101 S.Ct. 924, 66 L.Ed.2d 842 (1981). I agree with Professor Paul Chevigny of New York University: [T]he power to tempt into crime and then to leak the story is a particularly potent combination. Once the authorities have selected the target of th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Whitten, 706 F.2d 1000 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …at 2877, or where the issue conceded or neglected below is purely one of law and does not affect or rely on the factual record developed by the parties, Patrin, 575 F. 2d at 112; United States v. Gabriel, 625 F. 2d 830, 832 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1113, 101 S.Ct. 925, 66 L.Ed.2d 843 (1980), or where plain error has occurred and injustice might otherwise result, Okada, 694 F. 2d at 570 n. 8; United States v. Fong, 529 F. 2d 55 (9th Cir.1975). None of these exceptions applies here. Appellant’s argu…