JACK J. SCHOEMAKER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1968-05-17
No. 67-509
LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
210 So. 2d 269 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rankin v. State, Second District Court of Appeal, 209 So.2d 267, Opinion filed April 17, 1968; Nelson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 506.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …unction or otherwise in the circuit court.2 . See, e. g., Teston v. City of Tampa (Fla.1962), 143 So. 2d 473; Bay National Bank and Trust Company v. Dickinson (Fla.App.1969), 229 So. 2d 302; Meiklejohn v. American Distributors, Inc. (Fla.App.1968), 210 So. 2d 269; Harris v. Goff (Fla.App.1963), 151 So. 2d 642; Bloomfield v. Mayo (Fla.App. 1960), 119 So. 2d 417; and cf., Williams v. Ferrentino (Fla.App.1967), 199 So. 2d 504. See, also, Section 120.31(1), Fla.Stat.1971, F.S.A. . See, e. g., Section 120.31(4),…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw