HILL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (54 total)

• Wright v. State, 418 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …h” exception to the exclusionary rule, which would represent a partial “retreat” from the rule. At least one federal court has been inclined to engage in this retreat, United States v. Williams, 622 F. 2d 830 (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127, 101 S.Ct. 946, 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981). In Taylor v. Alabama, - U.S. -, -, 102 S.Ct. 2664, 2669, 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982), however, the U.S. Supreme Court refused, apparently based on the facts, to recognize the type of good faith exception envisioned b…
• State v. Thomas, 405 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …same reason, it is at best highly doubtful that Florida courts are constitutionally free to adopt the theory advanced by thirteen judges of the fifth circuit in United States v. Williams, 622 F. 2d 830, 840-47 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127, 101 S.Ct. 946, 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981), that evidence which is objectively determined to have been unconstitutionally and unreasonably secured may nevertheless be admitted if the officers were acting in subjective “good faith” at the time. See also,…
• Illinois v. Gates et ux., 462 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1983)
  …nt of law and the administration of justice throughout the Nation. The Court of Appeals for the second largest Federal Circuit [*254] has already adopted such an exception, United States v. Williams, 622 F. 2d 880 (CA5 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1127 (1981), and the new Eleventh Circuit is presumably bound by its decision. Several Members of this Court have for some time expressed the need to consider modifying the exclusionary rule, ante, at 224, and Congress as well has been active in explorin…