SANDATE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet, 658 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1995)
  …flects that the judge instructed the jury consistent with our findings in this opinion as well as with prior Florida case law. See Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. v. Gutierrez, 386 So. 2d 783 (Fla.1980) (insurer must investigate the facts), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 922, 101 S.Ct. 1372, 67 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981); Hollar v. International Bankers Ins. Co., 572 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (same), review dismissed, 582 So. 2d 624 (Fla.1991). Finally, State Farm argues that, if the trial judge’s final judgment is reverse…
• Raleigh Porter v. State, 478 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 1985)
  …earing and of the requested relief. We deny the application for stay of execution. It is so ordered. BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ„ concur. * United States v. Martinez, 630 F. 2d 361 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 922, 101 S.Ct. 1373, 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981), is easily distinguished. In Martinez defense counsel represented two persons charged in the same criminal episode; at one client's trial counsel complained and objected to the other one, his former client, tes…
• Solomon Webb v. State, 433 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1983)
  …There is no question that an attorney’s representing a defendant and a key prosecution witness creates a conflict of interest. E.g., Ross v. Heyne, 638 F. 2d 979 (7th Cir.1980); United States v. Martinez, 630 F. 2d 361 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 922, 101 S.Ct. 1373, 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); United States v. Morando, 628 F. 2d 535 (9th Cir.1980); Cowell v. Duckworth, 512 F.Supp. 371 (N.D. Ind.1981). A conflict may exist even though the defendant and prosecution witness are represented by different…