WOFFORD

v.

HARRIS, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Somer v. Johnson, 704 F.2d 1473 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …common law duty of care articulated in Bourgeois. In the absence of such a judicial determination, we must determine how the state courts would resolve the issue. See, e.g., Arceneaux v. Texaco, Inc., 623 F. 2d 924, 926 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 928, 101 S.Ct. 1385, 67 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981). In Florida, it is well established that the legislature has the authority to abrogate the common law. E.g., State v. Egan, 287 So. 2d 1, 6 (Fla.1973). Abrogation may be implied from an inconsistency between…
• United States v. Whiting, 781 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …s with great care."); United States v. Vasser, 648 F. 2d 507, 511 n. 3 (9th Cir.1980) ("In Soto-Soto, it was necessarily found that a border search not conducted by customs or immigration officers is, by definition, 'unreasonable.' ”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 928, 101 S.Ct. 1385, 67 L.Ed.2d 360 (1981); United States v. Johnson, 641 F. 2d 652, 659 n. 5 (9th Cir.1980) (same). . The EAA broadly provides: “To the extent necessary or appropriate to the enforcement of this act, ... any department or agency exerci…
• United States v. Goff, 681 F.2d 1238 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …at the time of the search. Defendants have not shown any prejudice from a confrontation with DEA agents pursuant to the warrant, nor alleged bad faith in the warrant’s issuance. United States v. Vasser, 648 F. 2d 507 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 928, 101 S.Ct. 1385, 67 L.Ed.2d 360 (1981).…