KATHERINE HEADRICK, PETITIONER,
v.
CYPRESS GARDENS CITRUS PRODUCTS, INC., HARDWARE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date November 30, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Petitioner is also denied.
CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
DREW, J., dissents with opinion.
(dissenting):
I would have argument. Deputy’s order is erroneous as a matter of law because he overlooks statutory definition of accident as including (since Bonnie Gray) “sudden or unexpected result
ON REHEARING GRANTED
After oral argument on rehearing granted, we adhere to our order of February 28, 1968 denying the petition for writ of cer-tiorari.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.
DREW, Justice
(dissenting):
I would have argument. Deputy’s order is erroneous as a matter of law because he overlooks statutory definition of accident as including (since Bonnie Gray) “sudden or unexpected result
PER CURIAM.
After oral argument on rehearing granted, we adhere to our order of February 28, 1968 denying the petition for writ of certiorari.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Provenzano v. State, 497 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 1986)…may only be convicted of second-degree murder — a killing by an act evincing a depraved heart — because of the lack of evidence indicating that the shooting of Wilkerson resulted from a premeditated design to kill Wilkerson. See Purkhiser v. State, 210 So. 2d 448 (Fla.1968). Premeditation can be shown by circumstantial evidence. Spinkellink v. State, 313 So. 2d 666 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911, 96 S.Ct. 3227, 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976). “Premeditation is a fully-formed conscious purpose to kill, which…
-
Knowles v. State, 632 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 1993)…ng, that he just might lose it and start shooting people in the trailer park is insufficient to support a finding of premeditation. However, there is sufficient evidence to support a conviction of murder in the second degree. See Purkhiser v. State, 210 So. 2d 448 (Fla.1968) (although evidence that young girl was shot during sudden, brief encounter between her father and defendant who came to door in search of another man was insufficient to prove premeditation, evidence was sufficient to support conviction o…
-
Hines v. State, 227 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)…premeditation necessary to sustain the verdict and judgment as discussed above, there does appear to be sufficient evidence to justify a verdict and judgment of second degree murder. Taylor v. State, 156 Fla. 122, 22 So. 2d 639; Purkhiser v. State, 210 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1968). Therefore, pursuant to Section 924.34, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the judgment of conviction for first degree murder is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to enter an appropriate sentence for murder in th…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence