FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
v.
DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE ET AL.; AND NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE V. DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE ET AL.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE ET AL.; AND NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE V. DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE ET AL.
450 U.S. 964
Supreme Court of the United States (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., 454 U.S. 27 (U.S. 1981)…that the “plain language of Section 441a(d)(3) precludes” the agency agreements between state committees and the NRSC. 212 U. S. App. D. C. 374, 383, 660 F. 2d 773, 782. We granted the petitions for certiorari filed by the Commission and the NRSC, 450 U. S. 964 (1981), and we now reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. I — I I — 1 Although the Court of Appeals first addressed whether and to what extent it should defer to the Commission’s construction of the Act, 212 U. S. App. D. C., at 377, 660…
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hendricks Cnty. Rural Elec. Membership Corp., 454 U.S. 170 (U.S. 1981)…ice of excluding from collective-bargaining units only those confidential employees with a “labor nexus,” while rejecting any claim that all employees with access to confidential information are beyond the reach of §2(3)’s definition of “employee.”7 450 U. S. 964 (1981). We hold that there is a reasonable basis in law for the Board’s use of the “labor nexus” test. We therefore reverse the judgments of the Court of Appeals, with directions in the Hendricks case to enforce the Board’s order,8 and with [*177] d…
-
LaMARCA v. R.V. Turner, 995 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1993)…e San Juan v. Hidalgo County Grand Jury Comm’rs, 622 F. 2d 807, 822 (5th Cir.1980) (finding that “the defendant [must] demonstrate that there is no reasonable expectation that the wrong will be repeated” (internal quotations omitted)), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 964, 101 S.Ct. 1479, 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981). We have held that [jurisdiction may abate if there is no reasonable expectation the alleged violations will recur and if intervening events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the allege…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence