IN RE RAMIREZ; AND IN RE DORTY

Citator

Cited By

• Cabell v. Chavez-Salido, 454 U.S. 432 (U.S. 1982)
  …dissenting, the court found its prior views still valid and convincing. It, therefore, came to the identical conclusion that the California statutory scheme was constitutionally invalid both facially and as applied. We noted probable jurisdiction, 450 U. S. 978 (1981), and now reverse. II Over the years, this Court has many times considered state classifications dealing with aliens. See, e. g., Ambach v. Norwich, supra; Nyquist v. Mauclet, 432 U. S. 1 (1977); Foley v. Connelie, supra; Examining Board v.…
• Prime Mgmt. Co. v. Steinegger, 904 F.2d 811 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …nt actually determined that claim or ground. See, e.g., Balderman v. United States Veterans Administration, 870 F. 2d 57, 62 (2d Cir.1989); Teltronics Services, Inc. v. L M Ericsson Telecommunications, Inc., 642 F. 2d 31, 35 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 978, 101 S.Ct. 1511, 67 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981). The fact that “both suits involved ‘essentially the same course of wrongful conduct’ is not decisive.” Lawlor v. National [*816] Screen Service Corp., 349 U.S. 322, 327, 75 S.Ct. 865, 868, 99 L.Ed. 1122 (1955)…