LOCAL LODGE NO. 875, BROTHERHOOD RAILWAY CARMEN OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO

v.

DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• Library OF Congress v. Shaw, 478 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1986)
  …portunity cost or from the effects of inflation, the increase is prohibited by the no-interest rule.7 See Saunders v. Clayton, 629 F. 2d 596, 598 (CA9 1980) (“In essence, the inflation factor adjustment is a disguised interest award”), cert. denied, 450 U. S. 980 (1981); Blake v. Califano, 200 U. S. App. D. C. 27, 31, and n. 9, 626 F. 2d 891, 895, and n. 9 (1980) (as a matter of economic theory, there may be a distinction between interest and a delay factor, but both are nonetheless prohibited by the no-in…
• United States v. Mendoza, 464 U.S. 154 (U.S. 1984)
  …e exception of orders granting naturalization to petitioners who filed petitions prior to the withdrawal of the appeal in 68 Filipinos. Brief for United States 11-12, and n. 13; Olegario v. United States, 629 F. 2d 204, 214 (CA2 1980), cert. denied, 450 U. S. 980 (1981). Mendoza’s petition for naturalization was filed after the Government withdrew its appeal in 68 Filipinos. Under res judicata, a final judgment on the merits bars further claims by parties or their privies on the same cause of action. Montan…
• Jean v. Nelson, 727 F.2d 957 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …ry mandate or an express prohibition.6 See Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 636-37, 72 S.Ct. 863, 870-71, 96 L.Ed. 1153 (1952) (Jackson, J., concurring); Olegario v. United States, 629 F. 2d 204, 226 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 980, 101 S.Ct. 1513, 67 L.Ed.2d 814 (1981). In practice, however, the comprehensive character of the INA vastly restricts the area of potential executive freedom of action, and the courts have repeatedly emphasized that the responsibility for regulati…

  ← 1 / 2 →