HOLSEY

v.

WATKINS, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir. 1985)
  …tates v. Watson, 599 F. 2d 1149, 1157 (2d Cir.) (occupation of participant in Witness Protection Program concealed), modified, 690 F. 2d 15 (2d Cir.1979), modified sub nom. United States v. Muse, 633 F. 2d 1041 (2d Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 984, 101 S.Ct. 1522, 67 L.Ed.2d 820 (1981); United States v. Cavallaro, 553 F. 2d 300, 304 (2d Cir. 1977) (address of witness concealed); United States v. Varella, 692 F. 2d 1352, 1355 (11th Cir.1982) (upholding Government’s objections during testimony…
• United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231 (8th Cir. 1984)
  …e act, the Fifth Amendment limits the punishment to a single act. 529 F. 2d at 562 (citations omitted). Appellants contend that Austin was followed by the First Circuit in United States v. DeVincent, 632 F. 2d 155, 159 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 984, 101 S.Ct. 1522, 67 L.Ed.2d 820 (1981), and the Second Circuit in United States v. Sperling, 560 F. 2d 1050, 1055 (2d Cir.1977). Appellants incorrectly construe these cases; DeVincent merely distinguished Austin in a footnote, and Sperling involved…
• United States v. The Southland Corp. & S. Richmond Dole & Eugene Mastropieri, 760 F.2d 1366 (2d Cir. 1985)
  …litate the arrest of codefendants; yet the Rule has never been read that way. See United States v. Watson, 599 F. 2d 1149, 1155 (2 Cir.1979), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. United States v. Muse, 633 F. 2d 1041 (2 Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 984, 101 S.Ct. 1522, 67 L.Ed.2d 820 (1981). The limiting effect of the Rule was to place sealing in the hands of a judicial officer rather than as theretofore in those of a prosecutor. 1 Orfield, Criminal Procedure Under the Federal Rules, supra, § 6:…