DE VINCENT

v.

PUTNAM, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Schlifke v. Seafirst Corp. & Seattle-First Nat'l Bank, 866 F.2d 935 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …of the Securities Act of 1933,4 this court has previously stated that “the statute explicitly requires privity between plaintiff-purchaser and defendant-seller.” Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 619 F. 2d 1222, 1226 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1005, 101 S.Ct. 1719, 68 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981). See also Barker v. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, 797 F. 2d 490, 494 (7th Cir.1986) (law firm and accounting firm which rendered services in connection with the sale of securities by a corporation cann…
• Woods v. Barnett Bank OF Fort Lauder-Dale, 765 F.2d 1004 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …they considered reckless. See, e.g., Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., 570 F. 2d 38, 47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1039, 99 S.Ct. 642, 58 L.Ed.2d 698 (1978); Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 554 F. 2d 790, 792-93 (7th Cir.1977) cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1005, 101 S.Ct. 1719, 68 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Franke v. Midwestern Oklahoma Development Authority, 428 F.Supp. 719, 725 (W.D.Ok.1976), remanded with instructions, 619 F. 2d 856 (10th Cir.1980). . For a description of some of the kinds of duties courts ha…
• Overton A. Currie v. Cayman Res. Corp., 835 F.2d 780 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …80, 695 (5th Cir.1971); see Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 619 F. 2d 1222, 1225 (7th Cir.1980) (“It is well settled that § 12(2) imposes liability without regard to whether the buyer relied on the misrepresentation or omission.”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1005, 101 S.Ct. 1719, 68 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Gilbert v. Nixon, 429 F. 2d 348, 356 (10th Cir.1970); John Hopkins Univ. v. Hutton, 422 F. 2d 1124, 1129 (4th Cir.1970). Plaintiffs [*783] seeking to recover under section 12(2) must only prove “that the defen…