CHRISMAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Johnson v. State, 438 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1983)
  …claims that a fellow inmate’s testimony as to Johnson’s admissions of guilt should have been suppressed under United States v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264, 100 S.Ct. 2183, 65 L.Ed.2d 115 (1980), and Malone v. State, 390 So. 2d 338 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1034, 101 S.Ct. 1749, 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981), because the other inmate had become an agent of the state. The inmate, Smith, had worked as an informant for the sheriff’s department several months prior to the incidents at issue here. After meeting Johnson…
• Dufour v. State, 495 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1986)
  …eliberately designed to elicit an incriminating statement.” Miller v. State, 415 So. 2d 1262, 1263 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1158, 103 S.Ct. 802, 74 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1983), quoting Malone v. State, 390 So. 2d 338, 339 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1034, 101 S.Ct. 1749, 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981). First, Miller approached the authorities on his own initiative, indicating scheming on his part rather than the government’s. Bottoson v. State, 443 So. 2d 962 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873, 105 S.Ct.…
• Muehleman v. State, 503 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1987)
  …iberately designed to elicit an incriminating statement.’ ” Miller v. State, 415 So. 2d 1262, 1263 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1158, 103 S.Ct. 802, 74 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1983) (quoting Malone v. State, 390 So. 2d 338, 339 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1034, 101 S.Ct. 1749, 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981)). First, Muehleman, apparently eager to talk, approached Rewis and began to repeatedly attempt to discuss details of the crime with him. Second, after unsuccessfully attempting to dissuade Muehleman from “talk…