MATHEWS

v.

OREGON

Citator

Cited By

• Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1982)
  …Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the imposition of a death sentence ón an offender because he was 16 years old in 1977 at the time he committed the offense; review of all other questions raised in the petition for certiorari was de-' nied. 450 U. S. 1040 (1981). Yet the Court today goes beyond the issue on which review was sought — and granted — to decide the case on a point raised for the first time in petitioner’s brief to this Court. This claim was neither presented to the Oklahoma courts nor p…
• Watt v. Energy Action Educ. Found., 454 U.S. 151 (U.S. 1981)
  …ons for the alternative bidding systems.11 Energy Action [*160] Educational Foundation v. Andrus, 210 U. S. App. D. C. 20, 654 F. 2d 735 (1980). We granted the Government’s petition for certiorari to review this construction of the 1978 Amendments. 450 U. S. 1040. Ill Before examining the merits, we must consider the petitioners’ contention that the respondents do not have standing to challenge the Secretary of the Interior’s choice of bidding systems. There are three groups of plaintiffs in this litigati…
• MacKowiak v. Univ. Nuclear Sys., Inc., 735 F.2d 1159 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …clusion and is provable by circumstantial evidence even if there is testimony to the contrary by witnesses who perceived lack of such improper motive.” Ellis Fischel State Cancer Hospital v. Marshall, 629 F. 2d 563, 566 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1040, 101 S.Ct. 1757, 68 L.Ed.2d 237 (1981), We defer to the inferences that the Secretary derives from the evidence, not to those of the ALJ. NLRB v. Brooks Camera, Inc., 691 F. 2d 912, 915 (9th Cir.1982). The record contains circumstantial evidence to…