ELCAN
v.
UNITED STATES
ELCAN
UNITED STATES
450 U.S. 1050
Supreme Court of the United States (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Greater Detroit Res. Recovery Auth. & Combustion Eng'g v. The United States Env't Prot. Agency, 916 F.2d 317 (6th Cir. 1990)…(1984). Accordingly, most circuits have held that the courts of appeals have exclusive jurisdiction to review actions of the Administrator of the EPA. See Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Costle, 630 F. 2d 754, 757 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1050, 101 S.Ct. 1770, 68 L.Ed.2d 246 (1981). This court so held even prior to the 1977 amendments. See Lubrizol Corp. v. Train, 547 F. 2d 310 (6th Cir.1976). That position was reaffirmed in Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. Costle, 647 F. 2d…
-
ANR Pipeline Co. v. The Corp. Comm'n OF the State OF Okla., 860 F.2d 1571 (10th Cir. 1988)…ness resulting from obedience to a new governmental rule. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm’r, 432 U.S. 333, 97 S.Ct. 2434, 53 L.Ed.2d 383 (1977); Mountain States Legal Found, v. Costle, 630 F. 2d 754, 764 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 1050, 101 S.Ct. 1770, 68 L.Ed.2d 246 (1981). The Pipelines also allege they purchase natural gas in Oklahoma, and § 240 applies to purchasers of natural gas. The Pipelines are subject to the comprehensive rules and regulations of the Federal Energy Regul…
-
Farmers Union Cent. Exch., Inc. v. Thomas, 881 F.2d 757 (9th Cir. 1989)…or”) (quotations omitted); Mountain States Legal Found. v. Costle, 630 F. 2d 754, 766 (10th Cir.1980) (citizen suit jurisdiction proper only in action to enforce “specific nondiscretionary clear-cut requirements of the Clean Air Act”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1050, 101 S.Ct. 1770, 68 L.Ed.2d 246 (1981). CENEX, however, can point to nothing in either the statute or the regulations requiring EPA to recognize all lead credit transfers if duly reported. See Council of Commuter Orgs. v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.…