UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
MILLER INDUSTRIES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
MILLER INDUSTRIES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
210 So. 2d 725
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See: Charles Sales Corp. v. Rovenger, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 551; Fink v. Powsner, Fla.App.1958, 108 So.2d 324; Mark Leach Health Furniture Co. v. Thal, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 64; Girten v. Bouvier, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 745; Wingreen Company v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 408; Disney v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 657.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Keith Invs., Inc. v. James, 220 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)…therefore no abuse of the trial court’s discretion has been demonstrated. Affirmed. REED, J., and MURPHREE, JOHN A. H., Associate Judge, concur. . Harbond, Inc. v. Anderson, Fla.App.1961, 134 So. 2d 816; St. Joe Paper Co. v. Brown, Fla.App.1968, 210 So. 2d 725. See also State ex rel. Kent Corporation v. Board of County Commissioners of Broward County, 1948, 160 Fla. 900, 37 So. 2d 252, wherein the court said that the determination of the assessor is entitled to great weight, especially where it bears the…
-
Aeronautical Commc'ns Equip., Inc. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 219 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…epreciation, obsolescence (and appreciation) is on the Plaintiff, not the Defendants. Hillsborough County v. Knight & Wall Co., supra.” We agree. See also Powell v. Kelly, Fla. App.1968, 214 So. 2d 347; and St. Joe Paper Co. v. Brown, Fla.App.1968, 210 So. 2d 725. Affirmed.…
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Tropical Park, Inc., 231 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…ely and the total tax assessment was apportioned accordingly * * * The landowner should be able to use the same method in contesting an assessment * * 199 So. 2d at 314. Under (b) the County relies upon St. Joe Paper Company v. Brown, Fla.App.1968, 210 So. 2d 725, and Aeronautical Commun. Eq. v. Metropolitan Dade Co., Fla.App.1969, 219 So. 2d 101. These cases stand for the proposition that all the criteria set forth in § 193.021, Fla.Stat., 10 F.S.A. (1967), must be considered, not just one. We find nothing…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Charles Sales Corp. v. Rovenger, 88 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1956)
- Fink v. Ira L. Powsner, 108 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)
- Girten v. Bouvier, 155 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Dotson v. Maddox, 143 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
- The Wingreen Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., 171 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Disney v. The Prudential Ins. Co. OF Am., 193 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)