TANKLINING CORP.

v.

GALVESTON SHIPBUILDING CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• Am. Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …he asserted “Ninth Circuit view,” has been expressly rejected by a number of other courts. Acme Precision Products, Inc. v. American Alloys Corp., supra; Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., 637 F. 2d 105, 117 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911, 101 S.Ct. 1981, 68 L.Ed.2d 300 (1981); Spectrofuge Corp. v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., 575 F. 2d 256, 276 n. 69 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 939, 99 S.Ct. 1289, 59 L.Ed.2d 499 (1979); United States v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., 245 F.Supp.…
• Jules Link and Solomon Katz v. Mercedes-Benz OF N. Am., Inc., 788 F.2d 918 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …ufacturer and others ‘had a conscious commitment to a common scheme designed to achieve an unlawful objective’ ”. Id. at 764, 104 S.Ct. at 1471 (quoting Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., 637 F. 2d 105, 111 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911, 101 S.Ct. 1981, 68 L.Ed.2d 300 (1981)). In addition, a section 1 plaintiff must introduce “evidence that tends to exclude the possibility that the manufacturer and ... distributors were acting independently.” Monsanto, 465 U.S. at 764, 104 S.Ct. at…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Gibbs, 739 F.2d 838 (3d Cir. 1984)
  …e of conspiracy measured by the "fair preponderance of independent evidence” test of United States v. Trotter, 529 F. 2d 806, 811-12 (3d Cir.1976). See also Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, 637 F. 2d 105, 115-17 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911, 101 S.Ct. 1981, 68 L.Ed.2d 300 (1981). Several other circuits have adopted a more stringent test than the preponderance of evidence rule for the admission of coconspirator statements. ' They require "substantial evidence,” independent of the state…