DAIRY MAID PRODUCTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

EXPERT DAIRY SALES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Steinhauer, 216 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1968)
  …ct with decisions of other district courts and this Court. We ’have granted certiorari and heard oral argument because we feel that the instant decision does directly conflict with Ex parte Kitts, 109 Fla. 202, 147 So. 573 (1933), and Sult v. Weber, 210 So. 2d 739 (4th Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1968). It likewise conflicts with obiter dictum in In re T.W.P., 192 So. 2d 482 (Fla.1966). See Sunad, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 122 So. 2d 611 (Fla.1960). The conflict derives from the following statements in Steinhauer, supra…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Richardson v. State of Fla. ex rel. Richard Douglas Milton, 219 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
  …prior existing standards provided a reasonably reliable device for arriving at the truth, despite announced improvements available under the new standards in Gault to furnish counsel to an indigent respondent. See also' Suit v. Weber, Fla.App.1968, 210 So. 2d 739; Cradle v. Peyton, 1967, 208 Va. 243, 156 S.E. 2d 874, 878. The parties have, by this appeal, also raised the correctness of the second hearing of May 16, 1967, wherein the appellee’s probation was revoked, and his incarceration was ordered. It mus…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Restrepo v. The Judges OF the Courts OF Broward Cnty., 231 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)
  …can find no error here in its denial. Even though a petition for habeas corpus could have been filed challenging the order of commitment by the juvenile court, such challenge should have been made in the juvenile court, Suit v. Weber, Fla.App.1968, 210 So. 2d 739. Having reviewed the entire records in these three appeals we find no demon [*20] stration of reversible error. Accordingly these causes are affirmed. Affirmed. OWEN, J., concurs. CROSS, C. J., concurs in conclusion.…

Authorities Cited

• Millard F. Caldwell v. Mass. Bonding & Ins. Co., 158 Fla. 677 (Fla. 1947)