PATTERSON

v.

GENERAL MOTORS CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Minority Emps. OF THE Tenn. Dep't OF Emp. Sec. v. State OF Tenn., 901 F.2d 1327 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …s not whether a particular form of nomenclature has been used, but whether "fair notice” has been given. Id. . The other case that was linked with Life Time in footnote 1 of Torres, Covington v. Allsbrook, 636 F. 2d 63 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 914, 101 S.Ct. 1990, 68 L.Ed.2d 305 (1981), was a pro se prisoner case of a sort that presents special problems not normally encountered where, as in the case at bar, litigants are represented by counsel. Of the three cases that the Torres footnote con…
• Simer v. Rios, 661 F.2d 655 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …l of class certification is limited. We can reverse this determination only if the district court’s decision denying certification was an abuse of discretion. Patterson v. General Motors Corporation, 631 F. 2d 476, 480 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 914, 101 S.Ct. 1988, 68 L.Ed.2d 304 (1981) (citing Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., 561 F. 2d 86, 90 (7th Cir. 1977)); Adashunas v. Negley, 626 F. 2d 600, 605 (7th Cir. 1980).23 The parties, as did the district court, focus on the concept of “manageab…
• Farley Transp. Co., Inc. v. The Santa FE Trail Transp. Co., 778 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …o appeal in this case. This is more than a clerical error.” Id. at 747; see also Covington v. Allsbrook, 636 F. 2d 63, 64 (4th Cir.1980) (extending Van Hoose to require “actual signing by pro se parties desiring to join in an appeal”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 914, 101 S.Ct. 1990, 68 L.Ed.2d 305 (1981). Finally, Farley contends that Cook is not dispositive because we should apply rule 10.4 of the Rules of the Supreme Court in this case. Rule 5 of the Rules of [*1370] the United States Court of Appeals for t…