ROCHE

v.

FENTON, WARDEN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Andrews v. State, 536 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …ndment issues cannot be considered without their testimony. We are cognizant of the holding that a search of a person or his baggage at the security checkpoint for boarding is proper. See United States v. Clay, 638 F. 2d 889 (5th Cir.), certfdenied, 451 U.S. 917, 101 S.Ct. 1996, 68 L.Ed.2d 310 (1981). Nevertheless, appellant, in the instant case, is entitled to a proper evidentiary hearing upon his motion to suppress. HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY, LETTS, GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. STONE, J., co…
• United States v. Mohammad Reza Mehrmanesh, 689 F.2d 822 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …értain the applicability of the sanctions to cases in which only the arrest occurred before July 1, 1979. See United States v. Addison, 633 F. 2d 861, 861 (10th Cir. 1981); United States v. Coffman, 638 F. 2d 192, 193 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 917, 101 S.Ct. 1995, 68 L.Ed.2d 309 (1981) (“sanctions are first effective as to [*829] cases which are filed on and after July 1, 1979”); United States v. Carreon, 626 F. 2d 528, 532 n. 5 (7th Cir. 1980) (sanctions applied only to cases “commenced with…
• Toussaint v. McCARTHY, 801 F.2d 1080 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …93] light of changes in governing law); EEOC v. International Longshoreman’s Ass’n, 623 F. 2d 1054, 1058 (5th Cir.1980) (law of the case does not apply when controlling authority has since made a contrary decision of law inapplicable), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 917, 101 S.Ct. 1997, 68 L.Ed.2d 310 (1981); White v. Murtha, 377 F. 2d 428, 431-32 (5th Cir.1967) (intervening controlling decision constitutes exception to doctrine of the law of the case), cited with approval in Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. at 618…