CASTILLO

v.

FORSHT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL

Citator

Cited By

• City of Akron v. Akron Ctr. for Reprod. Health, Inc., 462 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1983)
  …t 434 (emphasis added). The Court holds that the summary affirmance in Gary-Northwest Indiana Women’s Services, Inc. v. Bowen, 496 F. Supp. 894 (ND Ind. 1980) (three-judge court), aff’d sub nom. Gary-Northwest Indiana Women’s Services, Inc. v. Orr, 451 U. S. 934 (1981), is not, as the court below thought, binding precedent on the hospitalization issue. See ante, at 433, n. 18. Although the Court reads Gary-Northwest to be decided on the alternative ground that the plaintiffs failed to prove the safety of s…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Planned Parenthood Ass'n OF Kan. City v. Ashcroft, 664 F.2d 687 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …rationale of these decisions persuasive. However, it also found that, by affirming Gary-Northwest Indiana Women’s Services, Inc. v. Bowen, 496 F.Supp. 894, 896-902 (N.D.Ind.1980), aff’d sub nom. Gary-Northwest Indiana Women’s Services, Inc. v. Orr, 451 U.S. 934, 101 S.Ct. 2012, 68 L.Ed.2d 321 (1981), the Supreme Court had an opportunity to retreat from the “bright line” drawn in Roe v. Wade and declined to do so. Thus, it affirmed the district court’s holding that the statute was constitutional. Evidence…
• In re Cuyahoga Equip. Corp. v. United States, 980 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …Equip. Co., 342 U.S. 180, 183-84, 72 S.Ct. 219, 221, 96 L.Ed. 200 (1952) (emphasizing court’s discretion in such matters); Calavo Growers of Cal. v. Belgium, 632 F. 2d 963, 966 (2d Cir.1980) (noting district court’s “wide discretion”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 934, 101 S.Ct. 2012, 68 L.Ed.2d 321 (1981). Publicker mounts its attack first by pointing out that the instant refusal ignored the policy favoring consolidation of related litigation. This challenge overlooks the fact that bankruptcy and environmental…