EDGAR

v.

MITE CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Plyler v. DOE, 457 U.S. 202 (U.S. 1982)
  …lysis of the District Court, id., at 454-458, concluding that § 21.031 was "constitutionally infirm regardless of whether it was tested using the mere rational basis standard or some more stringent test,” id., at 458. We noted probable jurisdiction. 451 U. S. 968 (1981). No. 80-1934 In re Alien Children Education Litigation During 1978 and 1979, suits challenging the constitutionality of §21.031 and various local practices undertaken on the authority of that provision were filed in the United States Distr…
• Edgar v. Mite Corp., 457 U.S. 624 (U.S. 1982)
  …980). It agreed with the District Court that several provisions of the Illinois Act are pre-empted by the Williams Act and that the Illinois Act unduly burdens interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause. We noted probable jurisdiction, 451 U. S. 968 (1981), and now affirm. I — I h — 1 The Court of Appeals specifically found that this case was not moot, 633 F. 2d, at 490, reasoning that because the Secretary has indicated he intends to enforce the Act against MITE, a reversal of the judgment o…