FLETCHER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Manbeck, 744 F.2d 360 (4th Cir. 1984)
  …their investigation. A strong, emanating odor of marijuana comes within the "plain view” doctrine and need not be ignored by officers. See United States v. Haynie, 637 F. 2d 227, 233 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom., Fletcher v. United States, 451 U.S. 972, 101 S.Ct. 2051, 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); United States v. Sifuentes, 504 F. 2d 845, 848 (4th Cir.1974). . The government argues that the respective captains consented to follow the Customs officers back to Bennett’s Point Landing, and defendants sho…
• Reyes Barrera, Jr. v. Young, 794 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …ements to Anderson on April 4 were admissible under Stanislawski because sufficiently unrelated to the making or interpretation of the polygraph machine’s output. Barrera v. State, 99 Wis.2d 269, 282-89, 298 N.W. 2d 820, 826-29 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 972, 101 S.Ct. 2051, 68 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981). The answers were unrelated to the machine’s output because Anderson never turned the machine on. Anderson began his customary pre-test interview. He testified that he always asks some questions about the crim…
• United States v. Sliker, 751 F.2d 477 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …Notes of the Advisory Committee accompanying Rule 901 state that questions concerning authentication are governed by the procedures in Rule 104(b). See also O’Neal v. Morgan, 637 F. 2d 846, 850-51 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom. Esty v. O’Neal, 451 U.S. 972, 101 S.Ct. 2050, 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); In re Japanese Elec. Prods. Antitrust Litigation, 723 F. 2d 238, 284-85 (3d Cir.1983). Under Rule 104(b), the trial judge may make a preliminary determination as to the prior fact and admit the evidence to th…