HARRELL

v.

HOPKINS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• United States v. Mealy, 851 F.2d 890 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …l court’s decision unless it was an abuse of discretion. United States v. Fulk, 816 F. 2d 1202, 1205 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. D Antonio, 801 F. 2d 979, 983 (7th Cir.1986); United States v. Phillips, 640 F. 2d 87, 91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 991, 101 S.Ct. 2331, 68 L.Ed.2d 851 (1981). In deciding whether the court abused its discretion, we must keep in mind that a trial judge is often in the best position to determine whether an incident was so serious as to warrant a mistrial. United State…
• United States v. Peters, 791 F.2d 1270 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …n 11(D) and III(E), the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting this testimony, and therefore the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial. United States v. Phillips, 640 F. 2d 87, 91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 991, 101 S.Ct. 2331, 68 L.Ed.2d 851 (1981). H.SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE Odoner challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction on one count of conspiring to distribute cocaine. Odoner claims that the government never introduced…
• United States v. Zylstra, 713 F.2d 1332 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …sel in view of the totality of circumstances. See United States v. Fleming, 594 F. 2d 598, 606-07 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2863, 61 L.Ed.2d 299 (1979); and United States v. Phillips, 640 F. 2d 87, 92 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 991, 101 S.Ct. 2331, 68 L.Ed.2d 851 (1981). It is important to note that Zylstra does not complain that he was denied the opportunity to make fundamental decisions regarding his case (e.g., waiving a jury trial, testifying on his own behalf), see Jones…