BEACHEM

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1984)
  …ffered. See, e. g., United States v. Lipscomb, 226 U. S. App. D. C. 312, 332, 702 F. 2d 1049, 1069 (1983) (en banc); United States v. Kiendra, 663 F. 2d [*41] 349, 352 (CA1 1981); United States v. Fountain, 642 F. 2d 1083, 1088 (CA7), cert. denied, 451 U. S. 993 (1981); United States v. Toney, 615 F. 2d 277, 279 (CA5), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 985 (1980). The Ninth Circuit allows review if the defendant makes a record unequivocally announcing his intention to testify if his motion to exclude prior conviction…
• United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1982)
  …reach of the statute. Normally, the submission of a requested instruction is not sufficient to preserve for appeal complaint that the charge as given failed to include it, see United States v. Fountain, 642 F. 2d 1083, 1095 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 993, 101 S.Ct. 2335, 68 L.Ed.2d 854 (1981), but in this case, Judge Pratt informed counsel after considering and ruling upon requested instructions at a charge conference, that their objections voiced at that time would suffice to preserve issues for ap…
• United States v. Thetford, 676 F.2d 170 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …ons were not income to him. . See also United States v. Greschner, 647 F. 2d 740, 744 (7th Cir. 1981) (looking to legislative intent before applying the Blockburger test); United States v. Fountain, 642 F. 2d 1083, 1093-95 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 993, 101 S.Ct. 2335, 68 L.Ed.2d 854 (1981) (same); Pandelli v. United States, 635 F. 2d 533, 536 (6th Cir. 1980) (Blockburger test need not be applied when congressional intent clear). . Although Redfield was sentenced to serve concurrent terms of impr…