WHITE
v.
FINKBEINER
WHITE
FINKBEINER
451 U.S. 1013
Supreme Court of the United States (1981)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 21 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (21 total)
-
Cannady v. State, 427 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1983)…d 1093, 1097 (Mont.1979) (defendant’s statement “maybe I should have an attorney” is “within the ‘indicates in any manner’ language set out in Miranda as the requirement for an effective assertion of the right to counsel”), vacated on other grounds, 451 U.S. 1013, 101 S.Ct. 2999, 69 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981); Wentela v. State, 95 Wis.2d 283, 292, 290 N.W. 2d 312, 316 (1980) (“the defendant’s statement, ‘ “I think I need an attorney,” ’ or ‘ “I think I should see an attorney.” ’ is a sufficient request for counsel”)…
-
Vill. of Hoffman Ests. v. The Flipside, 455 U.S. 489 (U.S. 1982)…paraphernalia laws — and particularly to those regulating the sale of items that have many innocent uses, see, e. g., 639 F. 2d 373, 381-383 (1981); Record Revolution No. 6, Inc. v. City of Parma, 638 F. 2d 916, 928 (CA6 1980), vacated and remanded, 451 U. S. 1013 (1981)—may reflect a belief that these measures are ineffective in stemming illegal drug use. This perceived defect, however, is not a defect of clarity. In the unlikely event that a state court construed this ordinance as prohibiting the sale of al…
-
Solem v. Stumes, 465 U.S. 638 (U.S. 1984)
Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence