MONROE

v.

IDAHO

Citator

Cited By

• Ramirez v. State, 810 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 2001)
  …h, On Stabbing and Cutting Wounds from Knives with Serrated Edges, 54 German Journal of Forensic Medicine 273 (1963). . See generally Fleming, supra note 22. . See Wantland v. State, 45 Md.App. 527, 413 A. 2d 1376 (1980), vacated on other grounds, 451 U.S. 1014, 101 S.Ct. 3001, 69 L.Ed.2d 386 (1981), on remand, 49 Md.App. 636, 435 A. 2d 102 (1981); State v. D’Ambrosio, 67 Ohio St.3d 185, 616 N.E. 2d 909 (1993); Heidle v. State, 129 Tex.Crim. 201, 86 S.W. 2d 641 (App.1935); State v. Batten, 17 Wash.App. 428…
• Shea v. Louisiana, 470 U.S. 51 (U.S. 1985)
  …nounced, it surely would have been remanded, as were other such cases, for reconsideration in the light of Edwards. See Blakney v. Montana, 451 U. S. 1013 (1981); White v. Finkbeiner, 451 U. S. 1013 (1981) (on federal habeas); Leuschner v. Maryland, 451 U. S. 1014 (1981); Monroe v. Idaho, 451 U. S. 1014 (1981); Wantland v. Maryland, 451 U. S. 1014 (1981); James v. Illinois, 451 U. S. 1014 (1981). This Court’s actions in 1981 in these cases indicated no conclusion on its part that Edwards was [*56] inapplica…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• McBARRON v. S & T Indus., Inc., 771 F.2d 94 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …he impact of [such a] decision upon the integrity of the fund and its capability of providing real benefits to the workers.” Utility Workers, Etc. v. Consumers Power Co., 637 F. 2d 1082, 1093 (6th Cir.) (Engel, J., dissenting), vacated and remanded, 451 U.S. 1014, 101 S.Ct. 3000, 69 L.Ed.2d 385 (1981). On remand, the district court should, therefore, consider and enforce the parties’ intent.…