MESSINGER

v.

TOM

Citator

Cited By

• Oakes v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 546 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …is true that a finding that the jury was improperly influenced by considerations outside the record permits and may mandate a new trial. See Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So. 2d 669 (Fla.1959), Miles v. Ware, 204 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), cert. denied, 210 So. 2d 869 (Fla.1968). But Oakes’s appearance was pre-eminently within the record itself as a circumstance which the jury was not only entitled to, but probably required to consider. Florida Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Jones, 60 So. 2d 396 (Fla.1952); Jeep Corp.…

Authorities Cited

• Messinger v. TOM, 203 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)